Here is why I don’t write about what I am actually thinking

The reason that I frequently don’t post is that I go through extensive periods studying for the actuarial examinations.  When I am intensely studying, much of everything else is ejected from my life.

I will write about what I study each day, but it may numb your brain.

I love actuarial mathematics, but the concepts, mathematics, and formulas are really ugly at first.  Normally, I appreciate nice little beautiful mathematical statements that express deep truths.  Many actuarial formulas, however, are daunting.  They might have a dozen variables, each with its own complex definition.  They relate to finance, which seems so far removed from the beauty of pure mathematics, and far from the math that relates to the natural world.

But, the concepts that I learned for my last exam are now my intimate friends.  What were once jumbles of symbols on the page are now complex expressions of important truths.

Take this ugly beast, for the price of a call option:

\Delta =e^{-\delta h}\frac{C_u-C_d}{S(u-d)}

B = e^{-rh}\frac{uC_d-dC_u}{u-d}

The price of the call option is \Delta S +B .

I started at the far end, the most complicated spot.  Now let me back up and explain the essentials.

When we trade on the stock market, we do not always trade the actual stocks, commodities, or currencies.  We may be trading derivatives of these assets.  That is, we may be trading financial instruments whose value is derived from these underlying assets.

In concrete terms, we might engage in a contract to buy an ounce of gold for $1000 in one year.  This is a forward contract.

We might buy an option to buy one share of Ankle Compuners in one year for $1100.  If Ankle is selling for say $1500 at that point, we exercise our option, buy the stock for $1100, then immediately sell it for $1500, instantly making $400.  If Ankle is selling for less than $1100, we do not exercise the option.  We have lost whatever we paid for the option.  This is known as a call option.

We might buy an option to sell one share of Nash Motors in one year for $500.  If Nash is selling for say, $100 in one year, we exercise our option and sell the stock and have $500, instead of the $100 that Nash is worth.

Why do we use derivatives, instead of the actual asset?  To manage risk, like we did with our Nash stock.  This is like insurance.  To speculate on the market.  We can buy an interest in the performance of Ankle, without having to spend $1000 for an entire share.  We might also be buying derivatives because of reduced transaction costs, or because they can help us to avoid the tax implications of owning the asset.

Here is our question.  Given the value of a stock, S, the risk-free bond rate r, the dividend rate, delta, and the volatility of the stock price, how do we find the price of the call option to buy Ankle Compuner in our first example?

We begin with the law of one price.  Two instruments with the same cash flows should have the same price.  We know how to calculate the price and payoff of stocks and bonds.  So if we can create a portfolio of stocks and bonds with the same payoff as the call option, they must have the same price.

In one year, if Ankle Compuner is selling for more than 1100 (we call this the exercise price, K), the payoff is the price at expiration (St)-K.  So if it is selling at 1300, the payoff is 1300-1100=200.

In one year, if Ankle Compuner is selling less than 1100, the payoff is 0.

The formulas above use binomial option pricing to find the price of this portfolio, and hence a theoretically correct price for this call option.  Theory is important here:  an incorrectly priced option will lead to an arbitrage opportunity.  In short, the options may be bought and sold instantly (perhaps within billionths of seconds …) for a profit.

I can’t explain any more here without getting in real deep.

While I am studying on this stuff, I am writing C++ and VBA programs, as a way to learn some computer languages that are in demand for actuaries.  My “native” language is LISP.  Other languages seem really ugly.  When you are first learning a language, the code ends up pretty ugly anyways.

So, here is my code:

#include <cstdlib>
#include <iostream>
#include <cmath>
#include <iomanip>

//Calculates price of call option, and portfolio required to duplicate option, using binomial tree

int main() {
using namespace std;
    float S0, r,div, K, h, sigma, u, d, uS,dS,Cu,Cd,delta, bondValue, callPrice;
//get data
    cout<<“Calculate the price of a call, using a one period binary tree”<<endl;
    cout<<“Current Stock Price?”;
    cout<<“Continuously Compounded Risk Free Rate?”;
    cout<<“Continuous Dividend Rate?”;
    cout<<“Strike Price?”;
    cout<<“Time to Expiration?”;
//calculate likely upward and downward motions
    cout<<“Upward Move “<<uS<<endl;
    cout<<“Downward Move “<<dS<<endl;
//calculate payoff of call, given motions above
    if (uS > K)
    Cu = uS-K;
    else Cu = 0;
    if (dS > K)
    Cd = dS-K;
    else Cd = 0;
//calculate Delta, Beta, and call option price
    delta=exp(-div * h)*(Cu-Cd)/(S0*(u-d));
    bondValue=exp(-r * h)*((u*Cd)-(d*Cu))/(u-d);
    cout<<“To duplicate the call, buy “<<delta<<” shares of the stock for “<<delta*S0<<” dollars and borrow “<<-1 * bondValue<<” at the rate of “<<r<<” for a total price of “<<callPrice<<endl;
    cout<<“Price of Call “<<callPrice<<endl;

//find the price of some other related calls
    cout<<“Some other Call prices: “<<endl;
    float step;
    step = 0.05*K;
    K= K-5*step;
       for (int z=0;z<11;z++){
       if (uS > K)
    Cu = uS-K;
    else Cu = 0;
    if (dS > K)
    Cd = dS-K;
    else Cd = 0;

    delta=exp(-div * h)*(Cu-Cd)/(S0*(u-d));
    bondValue=exp(-r * h)*((u*Cd)-(d*Cu))/(u-d);

    cout<<setw(8)<<k<<” “<<callprice<<<span=”” class=”hiddenSpellError” pre=”” data-mce-bogus=”1″>endl;
    return 0;
//Wow what an ugly program

Here is a sample run:

Binomial option pricingIf we buy 0.5483 shares of Ankle, and borrow 496.15 dollars at the continuously compounded risk-free rate of 10% (our current artificially induced nearly 0% interest rates are way uninteresting for examples), for a total cost of $52.18, we will duplicate the payoff for our call.  So our call option should be $52.18.

Let’s check the math.

If we buy the one year $1100 call, and the stock price is 1221.40 in one year, our payoff will be 121.40.  If the price is 1000, our payoff is 0.

Suppose that we buy our $52.18 portfolio.

In one year, if the stock price is 1221.40, our 0.5483 share is worth $669.69.

We borrowed 496.15 at 10% interest.  In one year we must pay back 496.14e^{0.1} = \$ 548.16.   We sell the stock, and pay back the loan, for a payoff of $121.53.  Which is close enough due to all of the rounding that I did.

Now you see why I don’t write about what I think about all day.

9 Comments (+add yours?)

  1. The butch
    Oct 06, 2015 @ 06:59:24

    You lost me at “mathematics” and “actuarial.”

    I will say that I bought a bunch of Ancle Compuner stock for $24/share a very long time ago. And sat on it. Hard. I certainly enjoyed the 7/1 stock split that happened last year…

    My day-to-day thoughts are probably equally incomprehensible to others. They have a lot to do with cud and internal parasite loads.

    Liked by 1 person


    • The Final Rinse
      Oct 06, 2015 @ 09:37:49

      Good for you!
      The great thing is that actuaries aren’t all that interested in “get rich quick” type speculation. They are interested in keeping a steady cash stream for all of the expected insurance claims, or pension payments, that will be coming due soon.

      I am sure that keeping sheep also requires a lifetime hard won highly specialized knowledge. Farming knowledge is like this. As there are less and less small farmers, there are less and less people with the knowledge.

      My sister works in agriculture, as an entomologist. She has yet another level of knowledge which she and her colleagues expect farmers to learn.



  2. Ellen Hawley
    Oct 06, 2015 @ 08:24:42

    Eek. Numbers. The only part of that I followed was “what I think all day.” Which makes me realize that human beings are actually capable of thinking numbers. Who knew?

    Liked by 1 person


    • The Final Rinse
      Oct 06, 2015 @ 09:57:15

      I didn’t start studying math until my first career started winding down (2002). I had respect and interest in math, but not necessarily any natural talent.
      I realized right away that I needed to use my verbal skills to make up for a lack of numeric skills. I started working through a 1915 algebra textbook, while I read about math. I had a breakthrough when I read a mathematician, I think it might have been Bertrand Russell, say that he read about one page of mathematics per half hour. Over the last 13 years I have weaned myself from words, and onto symbols.
      My goal was to be able to understand what this “beauty of mathematics” is that I read about. Somewhere along the way, that became no longer a puzzle to me.

      Liked by 3 people


      • Ellen Hawley
        Nov 11, 2015 @ 09:05:21

        I’m impressed that you could find your way into math on your own. Seriously. I’ll confess to the occasional passing thought that I could make myself marginally competent if I really went at it but–oh, hell, I’m 68 and I just don’t care enough. I’m happy to keep learning other things–I’m not ready to close up my mind, keel over, and die–but math just isn’t calling to me.


  3. anexactinglife
    Oct 06, 2015 @ 12:30:55

    I thought I was doing OK until it was turned into code 🙂 It reminds me of poker, in that a professional makes these calculations look instantaneous, when actually it is based on years of knowledge and practice.

    Liked by 1 person


    • The Final Rinse
      Oct 07, 2015 @ 05:05:24

      In real life, a professional is a computer. Most stock trades do actually take place in billionths of seconds. But, there needs to be a few humans that understand what the computers are doing.



  4. Jamie Ray
    Oct 07, 2015 @ 01:43:24

    I always liked mathematics because the answer (at least through high school) was clearly right or wrong, and it wasn’t subjective the way Social Studies or English classes were (the way essays were marked). I took several college courses in Probability and Statistics and they were my favorite classes outside of my major (Civil Engineering) – but I never studied the concept of risk.
    The one thing probability taught me was to not gamble on things I couldn’t understand or figure out the odds on. I will not play the lottery or slot machines (I am also a sore loser).

    Liked by 2 people


    • The Final Rinse
      Oct 07, 2015 @ 05:27:06

      I discovered mathematics in 7th grade, when a teacher let us work at our own pace, and I completed the semester’s work in a few weeks.
      I re-discovered it in 9th grade algebra, where the teacher would make everyone do the last nights’ homework at the board. He was fearsome enough that I did my homework for the first time in my entire life. I learned that if I just worked a few exercises, I could do really well at math.
      I started programming in the late 1970’s. I let it drop for many years, but I am glad for the early experience.
      As humans explore the universe more-and-more deeply, we find that we live in more of a probabilistic world than a deterministic one.
      I don’t gamble ever either. We do know the odds, and they are against us.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Into the Nitty Gritty of a Male of Transgender Experience

 “You cannot control what happens to you, but you can control your attitude toward what happens to you, and in that, you will be mastering change rather than allowing it to master you.”

Gender Diversity at WSU Vancouver

Promoting awareness of gender diversity at WSU Vancouver

non-binary bound

a journey of top surgery for a non-binary body

The Recompiler

a magazine about building better technology, together

recess | city

move toward what moves you.

the ghosts journey

A transparent look in to the (no longer) closeted life of a transgender woman


arts journalism, ficiton, content writing.

Butch and Brat

The life and times of a butch woman and her offspring.

%d bloggers like this: